What is Ethical Storytelling?

Impact stories. Ethically.

“Ethical Storytelling” means different things to different people.

“Ethical storytelling” emerged from concerns about impact storytelling in the storytelling boom.

Impact storytelling was established as a common communications practice before ethical standards and best practices were established. At first, communications staff turned to journalism for ethical standards, however it quickly became clear that wasn’t enough: for one, a journalist has no relationship to the people in their story but a nonprofit very much does.

Today, “ethical storytelling” is considered important for any organization telling impact stories, but there is no consensus on when impact storytelling is considered “ethical storytelling”. This is due in part to the interdisciplinary nature of impact storytelling: when someone refers to “ethical storytelling” they are usually referring to a problem relevant to their discipline:

  • Communications practitioners are usually describing the production process of the story (e.g. the consent process)

  • Narratologists are usually critiquing the use of the story (e.g. fundraising emails and other forms of instrumentalization)

  • Media professionals — such as journalists — are usually describing the accuracy of the story (e.g. representation and attribution)

  • Advocates are usually describing the content of the story (e.g. language use or characterization that contribute to systems of injustice)

“Telling stories — about real people — narrated by organizations, without causing harm.”

— Fiona Ramsey, No Lip Service

Telling Stories
Defines “ethical storytelling” as an action, and includes all ethical issues related to the storytelling process.

Also includes all ethical issues related to narrative and storytelling, such as narrative identity, narrative agency and authorship.

About Real People
Does not apply to fictional stories.

Narrated by Organizations
Includes ethical issues relating to power (especially power disparities) and narration.

Without Causing Harm
Includes all the possible areas where harm could take place, including the real life of the story protagonist and the audience.

Concerns

Ethical Issue

Privacy & Consent

Benefit

Identity

Power

Real People

Audience

Society

Practitioners

Story Production

Story Text

Storytelling

Area of Impact

Area of Practice

  • How do practitioners account for the direct benefit to the organization as a result of telling someone’s personal story?

  • How do organizations acknowledge the purpose of the storytelling without affecting the story?

  • How is someone’s personal identity affected by a story told about them publicly, especially if it reveals some of the most difficult and/or traumatic times of their life?

  • How does someone retain agency over their identity if they consent to their story being told publicly? How was social media impacted identity?

  • How does the inherent power imbalance between an organization and someone impacted by its work create the risk of exploitation — intentional or otherwise.

  • How can practitioners prevent unintentional exploitation?

  • Was the story produced in a way that protected the privacy of real people?

  • Did they consent to participation in the story, and did they control the way they were represented?

  • Did their relationship with the organization influence their choices?

  • Voice of Witness’ Ethical Storytelling Principles

  • This area focuses on the text and meaning of the story, and whether it has been constructed in a way that supports social good; tension exists between critique and practice.

  • Further reading: Better Conversations about Ethical Storytelling